Most people hire a lawyer after being charged with a crime in Charlotte, NC. Under the constitution, you are granted the right to an attorney in a criminal matter. Some people, however, decide it is best to represent themselves in such matters. Termed Pro Se litigants, they to represent themselves in a criminal matter. Pro Se is a Latin term for "on ones behalf" or "for oneself". Although one is allowed to begin legal proceedings in civil matters as Pro Se at their own discretion, this is not true in criminal proceedings. In a criminal matter, a judge must give you permission to represent yourself. This is because of the high stakes and technical complexity, not to mention the potential consequences of being convicted in a criminal trial.
A judge must decide whether an individual is capable and competent of representing themselves as a Pro Se litigant in a criminal matter. In doing so, a the judge will look at several factors, including the defendants age, education level, language ability, and the nature of the crime. Based on factors like these, the judge will evaluate whether or not the defendant is capable of self-representation. If approved, the defendant must willingly forfeit their right to an attorney, at which time, they will be allowed to proceed with as their own attorney.
Sometimes, people who are not mentally fit or competent attempt to represent themselves in a criminal matter. In these instances, the judge has the right to override the request due to mental incompetency. In this case, often a mental or psychological expert will be called in to decide if the defendant's mental state is sufficient to represent themselves. They will be asked to give expert opinion on whether the defendant is mentally competent to represent themselves, and also if they are mentally fit to stand trial. In the event that they are deemed mentally unfit to stand trial, self-representation is a moot point. If a judge finds that a person is competent to stand trial, they still may rule that the defendant is not mentally competent to represent himself or herself, Pro Se.
It is typically considered a very bad idea to be a Pro Se litigant, unless your charges are very minor. Even, it is not recommended. One of the reasons for this is that in the event any procedural mistakes are made during your trial, representing yourself means you waive your rights to an appeal or mistrial. It could also be argued that the average person does not possess the knowledge required to navigate legal proceedings effectively. Given the complexity of criminal proceedings, and the availability of options for defendants in the form of private lawyers, court appointed lawyers and public defenders, it seems like a bad move with dire consequences to choose to represent you in a criminal matter.
If you or someone you know have been charged with a crime, it is important to consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney that can help zealously defend your case. Contact Us at Minick Law, P.C. for a free consultation on your case.
A judge must decide whether an individual is capable and competent of representing themselves as a Pro Se litigant in a criminal matter. In doing so, a the judge will look at several factors, including the defendants age, education level, language ability, and the nature of the crime. Based on factors like these, the judge will evaluate whether or not the defendant is capable of self-representation. If approved, the defendant must willingly forfeit their right to an attorney, at which time, they will be allowed to proceed with as their own attorney.
Sometimes, people who are not mentally fit or competent attempt to represent themselves in a criminal matter. In these instances, the judge has the right to override the request due to mental incompetency. In this case, often a mental or psychological expert will be called in to decide if the defendant's mental state is sufficient to represent themselves. They will be asked to give expert opinion on whether the defendant is mentally competent to represent themselves, and also if they are mentally fit to stand trial. In the event that they are deemed mentally unfit to stand trial, self-representation is a moot point. If a judge finds that a person is competent to stand trial, they still may rule that the defendant is not mentally competent to represent himself or herself, Pro Se.
It is typically considered a very bad idea to be a Pro Se litigant, unless your charges are very minor. Even, it is not recommended. One of the reasons for this is that in the event any procedural mistakes are made during your trial, representing yourself means you waive your rights to an appeal or mistrial. It could also be argued that the average person does not possess the knowledge required to navigate legal proceedings effectively. Given the complexity of criminal proceedings, and the availability of options for defendants in the form of private lawyers, court appointed lawyers and public defenders, it seems like a bad move with dire consequences to choose to represent you in a criminal matter.
If you or someone you know have been charged with a crime, it is important to consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney that can help zealously defend your case. Contact Us at Minick Law, P.C. for a free consultation on your case.
About the Author:
Looking to find the best Charlotte Criminal Defense Lawyer?, then visit www.minicklaw.com to find the best Criminal Defense Attorney for you.
No comments:
Post a Comment