Defining Courtroom Lingo With Joe Piacentile

By Bob Oliver


If you want to talk about terminology, as it relates to the courtroom, it goes without saying that there are various points of interest to make note of. I am sure that others will agree with this, especially if they served as jurors in the past. Joe Piacentile can recognize a number of common terms, though it's easy to imagine that others will be less familiar. With that said, here is what you should know if you want to become familiar with such lingo.

Damages - When someone takes another person to court, more often than not, money is the goal. This is used in order to cover any kind of harm or ill doing that was conducted. For instance, if someone wrote a slanderous article about another person - which turned out to be untrue - the writer would be sued. The money that would be received from the case, provided it is successful on the part of the plaintiff, would be known as the damages. This is just one term that Joseph Piacentile can tell you of.

Cross-Examination - When it comes to the most important elements of any hearing, information will rank highly. The way to get information from various parties is with cross-examination, which entails responsibility on the part being spoken to. This individual must not only provide as much detail as possible, but the most honest responses to boot. If this level of care is not taken, the ability for a decision to ultimately be made won't come along as easily.

Breach - This is what happens when you break a binding rule or guideline that has been set in place. For instance, if you have been contracted to work in a particular establishment for a certain length of time, a legal agreement has been set in place. Going against said agreement can be seen as a breach, which is against the law. Fortunately, an instance like this is where names such as Joe Piacentile can provide even greater expertise.

Verdict - Without question, you should know what term is all about. When it's said that the judge has reached a verdict, it means that the individual in question has determined whether an accused party is innocent or guilty. This is done based on the litany of details supplied in the courtroom, whether through physical evidenced or, as discussed earlier, extensive cross-examination. Without these details set in place, it's unlikely that a verdict would be found.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment

Nourishing Your Three- to Five-Year-Old: A Guide to Healthy Eating

Introduction As your child enters the preschool years, their nutritional needs continue to evolve. Providing them with a healthy and balance...

Top Articles for You